Applications Services Blog
Get the latest thought leadership and information about the role of Applications Services in an increasingly interconnected world at the HP Blog Hub.

Debunking the 3 Myths of Knowledge Management

By:  Laurence Smith, HP Knowledge Architect and Transformation Consultant


I often run across 3 myths that customers have regarding knowledge management. Because these myths seem so prevalent, I want to debunk these fallacies, which include:HP KM Model.jpg


Myth #1 – You can’t measure the value of knowledge

Myth #2 – You can’t capture knowledge

Myth #3 - Knowledge management is about people, not IT


Today, I’ll discuss the first myth but before I begin, I want to define what I mean by “knowledge” (distinct from “information” and “data”); otherwise I have no chance of debunking any myth that uses the same term.


“Knowledge” is an “asset” that we use to make effective decisions quickly and consistently. An “internal process” that guides us to seek out the most relevant data and information (and people, i.e., sources of knowledge) for the most desirable outcomes. Whether it is how to diagnose and fix a problem, execute a process, write a sales proposal, or produce an Enterprise Architecture, knowledge leads me towards the best decision. As my colleague Stuart Rance says in his post titled “6 steps to get started with knowledge management,”the only knowledge that is of any value is the knowledge in someone’s head that helps them make decisions and deliver services.” However, it is possible to make some knowledge assets explicit so that they can be used by many individuals to make decisions.



It is possible to measure the outcomes of using knowledge


I can measure the outcomes of my decisions, e.g., “Did this resolution (=decision) fix the customer’s problem?” or “Did this proposal lead to a successful bid?” In both examples, the “knowledge asset” is an “internal process” that was followed in identifying the resolution and constructing the proposal.


When I use a knowledge asset to make a decision that leads to a favourable and measurable result, I can rightly assert that it helped me achieve the desired outcome. If that knowledge asset happened to be “tacit” (inside my head), then I could attribute it to my “experience.” However, if the knowledge asset is in an explicit form, such as in a well-structured document, a rule base, or a decision tree, then I should reach the same conclusion. In practice though, this often doesn’t happen and the credit is given to the individual who applied the knowledge asset and not to the asset itself!



Connecting knowledge to outcomes of use


The quality of knowledge impacts the quality and consistency of the decision-making processes that use it. For example, if my knowledge is inaccurate, incomplete, and inconsistent, then it will increase my risk of making a decision that yields an undesirable outcome.


The ease of access to relevant knowledge will directly impact the speed of decision-making. In other words, the more time I spend searching for vital knowledge, the more time it will take me to make a decision.



We can illustrate this through a simple equation:

Decision time = knowledge access time + knowledge application time


  • If the knowledge asset I use to make the decision is tacit, then ‘knowledge access time’ will shrink to almost zero.
  • However, if the knowledge asset I need is explicit, I must go and find it and my decision time will be greater.



So what are the practical “value measures” (of knowledge) I can use?


There are two sets:

1. Outcome measures – measures of the effectiveness, efficiency and consistency of the processes where human decisions are needed


2. Control measures – measures quality of our knowledge assets and average speed of access




I would expect there to be a relationship between these two sets of measures. Here are two examples.


  • In a Service Centre – There are relationships between the quality of knowledge assets and First Contact Resolution Rate; knowledge access time and customer contact time.
  • In a Software Factory – There are relationships between the quality of knowledge assets and product quality (e.g., measured by test success rate); knowledge access time and process efficiency.



I often wonder whether “knowledge management” is a misnomer and should be re-named “continuous decision improvement” so that it states what it can do for us and not what it is. I hope that this first post will lead you to the same conclusion.


In my next post I’ll tackle Myth #2 – You can’t capture knowledge. This is another inaccurate perception that I’ll address…stay tuned!


Learn how HP Information Management and Analytics connects and converts intelligence across your organization to create value.


Stuart_Rance | ‎10-07-2012 11:50 PM

I think you are absolutely right about the importance of measuring the outcomes from Knowledge Management, but I would have loved to see some suggestions on how this measurement could be used to drive behaviour by use of gamification.


Thank you for the link to my blog 6 steps to get started with knowledge management

Alan Frost(anon) | ‎10-10-2012 02:24 AM

While I agree in principle with some of the ideas in this post, I think it is very difficult to get a usable measurement. The problem is that the outcomes are not only a product of a person's or company's knowledge. They are also affected by organizational, managerial, or even cultural factors. For example, a worker might feel that he needs to abide by company procedures, even if he has the knowledge to do better; an Indian worker might be hesitant to question authority; and the politics in a given organization can play havok on the processes and decisions that are made.


Another problem with tacit knowledge is that it is created by doing and experimenting. Tacit knowledge can also be "retrieved" when you do not have it, but instead of going to read an article you might contact an expert, consult with a co-worker, etc.


Yet another difficulty comes from the fact that there are short and long term goals. Some knowledge may be very valuable in the future, and it might be very much in the company's best interest to build a set of skills, the value of which are virtually impossible to quantify in the present.


So, while I agree that there is a relationship between good knowledge and good decisions, I think it is often difficult to effectively measure the value of knowledge. Perhaps a better statement might be "it is very difficult to accurately measure the value of knowledge".

Roy Woodhead(anon) | ‎10-10-2012 09:44 AM



I think this is an interesting viewpoint and one in which we need to take time to check the words we use are being used consistently.


You view knowledge as an asset, as some 'thing' we can measure, as ontological and in some way separate from other 'things'. Whilst I can see that might work in some cases such as a Knowledge base used by Incident Management built up from technical experience, I am not sure it can be used for 'all' situations.


I agree that outcomes can be evaluated even if we have to use probabilistic reasoning; but that's the output of knowledge + assumptions + unconsidered events + action.


I also think we need to be clear that the flip side of knowledge is uncertainty. That uncertainty only enters our awareness when there is a desirable outcome (e.g. to win the lottery I need to remove the uncertainty over which numbers will make my ticket the winner).


So I see this discussion as one factor amongst others for decisions that require knowledge of more complex interfaces between people, process and technology. For want of a better term, what I am getting at is "organisational intelligence".


For me, it is this wider consideration that is the cause of my hesitation in agreeing with your 'scope of consideration'. It may be you hold a more focused view of Knowledge in this blog that is the case with the view I hold about a much wider network of interactions that would lead to an improvement in Organisational Intelligence.


Great Blog !!!


Best wishes




Julian Clarke(anon) | ‎10-10-2012 12:57 PM

I understand and support your view Laurence - "what gets measured gets done".  How many of us store our data, information and knowledge on our hard drives rather than making it available to a wider audience - I plead guilty my lord!  Placing a measure on re-use or speed of access of knowledge should be one of the key business measures and raised up and discussed by each leadership team at least monthly - like the financial numbers.

LaurenceSmith | ‎10-10-2012 10:51 PM

Hi Stuart,

thanks for your thought-provoking reference to gamification. I guess you mean applying gamification techniques to present  KM measures in order to stimulate behaviour change e.g., leaderboards, progress bars to help drive up the quality of knowledge assets. My post didn't extend to how the various KM measures could be presented although this is worth considering!

LaurenceSmith | ‎10-10-2012 11:26 PM

Hello Alan and thank you for your comment.


I agree: it is difficult to measure accurately the value of knowledge but I believe that that shouldn't stop us trying. You are right that there are other factors that can be considered when associating outcomes to knowledge and it depends on the culture and other environmental factors as to whether the desired outcome is achieved. I think that this is why knowledge management requires some cultural change (supported by good IT!) to help increase knowledge sharing, application, growth and continuous improvement.


I also agree that knowledge is a perishable asset, just like some "tangible" assets. Many years ago, when I started my career in the IT business, I used to get asked questions about Fortran but now I don't (and even if I did, I would probably wouldn't know the right answer any more!). So I could surmise that the "value" of knowledge about Fortran has decreased because it is never applied to make decisions any more - although this won't be true for all organisations! Recognising that knowledge is a perishable asset  makes the case for measuring it even stronger.

LaurenceSmith | ‎10-11-2012 05:49 PM

Hi Roy,

I'm glad you brought up the subject of "organisational intelligence" because I maintain the view that knowledge management is one of the enablers of true organisational intelligence. It's interesting that individual humans  demonstrate intelligent behaviour regularly: we learn from mistakes quickly; respond and adapt to changes; predict and position ourselves before changes occur; etc. Organisations often struggle to demonstrate this ability and I think that it's because they lack the ability to grow and share the knowledge of their "consitituent parts" (i.e., employees) effectively. How simple it would be if we were all Borg (see Star Trek Second Generation)! Perhaps even more importantly, our apparent intelligence is due to knowing what we need to know (and this changes, as alluded to in Alan's comment), which is where we are back to measurement again. 

LaurenceSmith | ‎10-11-2012 05:57 PM

Thanks for the comment Julian. If you have the appetite for it, I attach a link to one of the true Masters of Intangible Asset and Intellectual Capital measurement (perhaps I should have included this link in my original post), Karl-Erik Sveiby and Intangible Asset measurement (I include "knowledge" in this context as an "intangible asset").

Leave a Comment

We encourage you to share your comments on this post. Comments are moderated and will be reviewed
and posted as promptly as possible during regular business hours

To ensure your comment is published, be sure to follow the community guidelines.

Be sure to enter a unique name. You can't reuse a name that's already in use.
Be sure to enter a unique email address. You can't reuse an email address that's already in use.
Type the characters you see in the picture above.Type the words you hear.
About the Author
About the Author(s)
  • Business Development leader for HP’s Testing Practice in Americas and TaaS Global Capability Leader
  • Anthony works in the ES Apps Enterprise APJ . He is a self-motivated and well-disposed individual. He is a certified SAP FICO consultant. He has over twenty years industry experience in business transformation and Information Technology consulting (SAP). With excellent, interpersonal and communication skills, Anthony is able to influence and motivate at all levels. An empathic team player, He derives fulfilment in contributing towards others' development. Anthony possesses good analytical and problem-solving skills. He is a quick thinker, remains calm under pressure, handles multiple tasks, and accomplishes objectives with excellent time management. He is flexible and accustomed to meeting high standards and deadlines. Anthony possesses practical knowledge of business processes and concepts and has a keen eye for detail. He is aware of the importance of an effective system and quality management.
  • Bryan Coapstick is the Director of Mobile Innovation at HP. In this role, he is responsible for driving strategic mobility initiatives and key industry partnerships to enable clients the ability to leverage the mobile channel to effectively reach their customers. Bryan’s expertise lies with several Fortune 200 companies in both public and private sectors that focus on business technology and emerging strategies. Bryan demonstrates innovative leadership though public speaking, panel discussions and blogging on the various ways mobility is changing our daily lives.
  • Benjamin Romberg has over twenty five years experience in the IT industry, the last twelve of which have been as a testing professional. He has experience as a test analyst, performance tester, automation specialist, test lead, test manager, test consultant and test executive. He has worked on all types of testing engagements ranging from small web based applications through to core system upgrades. Benjamin holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Genetics, a Post Graduate Degree in Software Engineering and an Executive Masters in Business Administration. Benjamin now leads HP’s Testing and Quality Assurance Practice in Asia Pacific and Japan.
  • Over the past 5 years, I have participated in the different stages of delivering Microsoft Enterprise Applications to customers as large as 40.000 concurrent users across Europe with a focus on the public and call center sector. During this period, I worked in numerous technical (lead) and business consultant roles. Using this experience, I am currently a certified Microsoft Dynamics CRM 2011 expert which specializes in guiding enterprise customers and implementation teams through the process of implementing Microsoft Dynamics CRM 2011.
  • Craig has been with HP for 10 years working on the solutioning side as a Solution Architect. Primarily works with Microsoft technologies and has for the better part of 16 years. This past year Craig has worked mostly with Windows AZURE and the mobility side of Windows Phone 7/8 and Android.
  • Master Business Consultant and Distinguished SE with 35+ years of IT experience, specializing in SOA and Integration.
  • Daniel Amor (EMEA, AMOD, Cloud, Portals, Web Apps and SOA domain expert): Daniel has designed, won, led and delivered large-scale, complex applications-related projects by acting as a trusted advisor to clients. Daniel conducts regular training and client-facing sessions, and he has authored six books and numerous articles in European and US-based magazines and newspapers on IT change. He is a regular lecturer and he speaks on Portals, E-Business and Cloud.
  • Global HP Microsoft Business Applications Practice. Microsoft Dynamics CRM subject matter expert. Based in Manchester, United Kingdom. @DarrenCRM on Twitter
  • Solutions Architect working at HP since 2002 with focus on Applications Modernization, located at Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Managing Consulting specialising in Business Transformation and Value Management for Defence, Healthcare, Public Sector, Criminal Justice and Telecommunications.
  • Guido Arndt is since May 1997 business consultant and project manager @ Hewlett Packard Enterprise Services. Main focus is strategic and organizational alignment of logistics, sales and production processes in the automotive and manufacturing industry as well as business performance projects in finance and telecommunication industry. Guido has experience as change agent and transformation manager in people-driven merger & aquisition projects focusing government, consulting firms, manufacturing plants and consumer brands.
  • Horia Slușanschi serves as an Agile Coach leading the HP Agile Mentoring Office and the HP Software Engineering Profession. He is passionate about helping teams and leaders to find joy in work in the pursuit of customer delight.
  • CISSP, Open CA Master Architect Technical Consultant with 28+ years of IT experience specializing in Application Security, Solution Architecture, Portals, Social Business, and Integration
  • Jim has been with HP for 33 years and currently leads a global Strategic Capabilities Management team, with a specific focus on Business Analysis and Configuration Management. Jim also manages a team within the US State, Local, and Education division of HP. He was a member of the IIBA committee that created a Business Analyst Competency Model and he participated in the development of IEEE standards. Jim graduated from Harvard University, the University of British Columbia, and Ottawa Theological Hall. He currently lives in Toronto, Canada.
  • SAP Technologist from APPS GD SAP Practice - Manila covering SAP NetWeaver EP, SAP Mobility and general SAP solutions.
  • WW product marketing manager for HP Applications Modernization and Transformation Consulting Services. 35+ years of IT technology and services experience.
  • Laurence has over 35 years experience in the IT industry and has spent 27 years delivering knowledge management (and before that became fashionable, Artificial Intelligence and knowledge-based systems) transformation projects to clients in Government, Industry, Manufacturing and Telecomms industries. He has developed and implemented knowledge management (KM) strategies for HP's clients and for business areas in HP (for BPO and for our Consulting business) and believes that KM strategy is essential for an effective KM practice.
  • . . Service Systems . .
  • Lori Lewis leads Global Digital and Integrated Marketing for the Applications and Business Services division in HP’s Enterprise Services. The organization is focused on providing clients with enterprise applications services and solutions to solve some of their most pressing business problems. For over 2 decades, she has championed innovative communication approaches to drive and grow market share and build motivated, empowered teams. She is a compelling, passionate ambassador of the art and science of marketing and the amazing results it can achieve when done with integrity and passion. Ms. Lewis’ credentials, track record, and enthusiasm are essential ingredients her team relies on as they work together to establish HP as the undisputed leader in information management and analytics services.
  • Microsoft Dynamics CRM solution architect, C# developer, MBA, husband, father, Auburn man. Follow me on Twitter @lucas_is.
  • CRM enthusiast, avid techie
  • More than 10 years of experience in developing effective and innovative marketing and communication strategies. Recently I have studied the effects of social media and disruptive technology on business, marketing, and culture. Follow me on Twitter: @micaelaraimondi
  • Agile Champion and coach. Passion in software development using lean and agile techniques. Software is a people business!!
  • Have 11 years of experience in SAP Consulting, Solutioning and Account management.
  • I have over 20 years of I.T. experience predominantely in applications development. In addition to my I.T. experience I spent 7 years as the Director of Store Services at Canada's third largest grocery retailer.
  • Shafraz Nasser is the Lead Microsoft CRM Architect with HP Enterprise Services in the South Pacific Microsoft Dynamics Practice. His focus is on selling, architecting and overseeing delivery of Microsoft Dynamics CRM based implementations within New Zealand.
  • Shefali Dua is leading Worldwide BPaaS Strategy & Solution Innovation team at HP Enterprise Services as the Solution Innovation Manager. Her focus is currently assisting in planning and delivery of industry solutions for verticals like social media, big data, mobility and security on the HP Enterprise Cloud offerings for CRM Technologies.
  • Steve Petruno is a Product Manager for HP’s Global Oracle Services with over 24 years experience in the Information Technology industry, project Management, Human Resources, Payroll and Benefits, ERP implementations, upgrades, acquisitions and divestitures.
  • I have worked for HP as a business consultant for seven years, providing process, strategy and business transformation advice in the Financial Services and UK Government sectors. As part of this I have used Lean and Continuous Improvement techniques to assess and improve business performance, ensure regulatory compliance and improve environmental sustainability.
  • Tom is the Global Product Marketing lead for HP's Cloud Applications Services. Tom has over 20 years of experience in information technology and a proven track record for implementing innovative client solutions in several industries including government, healthcare, and telecommunications. He thrives on developing services and solutions which result in business process improvement through greater systems efficiency.
  • Vijay Seetharaman is an Enterprise Architect within HP Enterprise Services - Industry Transformation Consulting practice, focusing on Cloud and Mobility

Follow Us