New benchmark: EVA + SSDs = more energy-efficient performance

by HPStorage-Guest on 07-30-2010 04:00 PM - last edited on 07-30-2010 04:43 PM

By Duane Gray, EVA Product Manager

 

If you manage a data center you know: Optimizing energy use is a real concern. We know many of our customers cite power and cooling as limiting factors to IT growth rate. Until recently, you’ve had no way to measure a storage device’s use of energy as it relates to the device’s performance. You couldn’t tell whether or not an array that was performing quite nicely was efficiently using energy—or if performance was coming at the expense of an energy “hog.”
 
Responding to the need for a benchmark that examines storage performance and energy usage, the Storage Performance Council created the SPC Benchmark 1/Energy(SPC-1/E) as an extension to the SPC Benchmark 1. The SPC-1 benchmark provides a measure of performance using a synthesized OLTP-like workload, normalized against the cost of the solution. The energy measurement and reporting in SPC-1/E give you visibility to the annual energy costs associated with servicing these types of I/O demands with a particular storage device.  

We all know too, that solid state drives (SSDs) now available in many storage devices hold the promise of high performance and low power. To demonstrate the benefit of including SSDs in the Enterprise Virtual Array (EVA), we recently put an SSD-equipped EVA6400 to the SPC-1/E test.

 

The result? The EVA6400—with 8 72GB SSDs—provided a composite IOPS/Watt metric of 15.68. That’s much better than the competitive postings using 10K RPM FC HDDs.  

 

But why not read the benchmarks results for yourself!  Here's a link to the Executive Summary and the Full Disclosure Report.

We encourage you to share your comments on this post. Comments are moderated and will be reviewed and posted as promptly as possible during regular business hours.

To ensure your comment is published, please follow our community guidelines.

Comments
by Andrew Fidel(anon) on 07-30-2010 10:17 PM

Ugh, the cost of those older STEC drives is just insane, upgrade to the Gen2's, it's pretty bad when EMC is beating you by ~300% on $/GB =(

by duane1956gray on 08-02-2010 06:31 PM

Hi Andrew.  Thanks for your comment.  The tested SSD is a Gen2 drive.  Our pricing information shows that the pricing for the tested SSD is close to EMC's pricing for the same capacity drive.

by Andrew Fidel(anon) on 08-03-2010 03:50 PM

EMC lists the 200GB SSD for $12000, assuming the same kind of discount as HP quotes in the benchmark that brings the "retail" price to $8760 or $43.80/GB vs $106.87/GB for the EVA drive. That's a difference of 2.44x, so 3x might be a slight exageration but just barely.

 

I really like HP and I'm a fan of the EVA but I'm certainly going to call HP out when there is that big a gap between them and the competition.

by duane1956gray on 08-03-2010 11:44 PM

Hi Andrew.  Thank you for clarifying that you were comparing EMC’s 200GB SSD to HP’s 73GB SSD.  We will have more to say about larger capacity SSDs for the EVA in the future.  I appreciate your feedback.

Post a Comment
Be sure to enter a unique name. You can't reuse a name that's already in use.
Be sure to enter a unique email address. You can't reuse an email address that's already in use.
Type the characters you see in the picture above.Type the words you hear.

Find HP in Social Media

Facebook Twitter YouTube SlideShare Flickr
About the Author
  • 25+ years experience around HP Storage. The go-to guy for news and views on all things storage..
  • This profile is for team blog articles posted. See the Byline of the article to see who specifically wrote the article.
Labels