Product Development and Supply Chain, two sides of the same coin

by on 04-14-2010 05:31 PM

In most companies today, product development & engineering (PD&E) and supply chain are two different worlds, each with their own rules, their own way of operation and their own approaches. I remember a meeting with a client a couple years ago, where probing about how product development and manufacturing communicate to optimize the design of a product for manufacturing, and was told in no uncertain terms that the company had a product development, an engineering and a manufacturing department, and that each was independent.


Beyond the organizational debates, it is critical for organizations to have PD&E and Supply Chain working closer together. As patil, Bath and Ragsdell point out in an article titled "Accelerated Product development and Supply Chain Management", the three key components influencing the profitability of manufacturing organizations are quality, cost and delivery. It is by taking a holistic view that these objectives can be addressed.


PD&E should lead the product lifecycle, from concept development to end-of-life, being responsible not only to bring the concept to market (New Product Introduction), but also to manage all engineering changes along the lifecycle of the product. Gaining feedback from services (both for products under warranty and for others), the PD&E team can improve the quality of the product, and with it the experience of the customer.


Supply Chain on the other hand is responsible for the cash-to-cash cycle, from the order to the delivery of the product. They handle the manufacturing (outsourced or not), the supply of components/ingredients, the delivery of the product through the chosen distribution channels and the services/reverse logistics.


Not only do information flows need to be exchanged between the two key business processes, but decisions taken in one have major impact in the other. Many years ago, companies started to focus on "design for manufacturing (DfM)", now a newer term; "design for supply chain" is in vogue. But in practice, how much is implemented? That's the real question.


PD&E teams are creative and focused on innovation, while Supply Chain teams focus mainly on operations, ensuring the predictability of their eco-system. A different type of individuals can be found in each organization. This results in mis-understandings. Conflicts are difficult to settle and final decisions may have to be taken high up the hierarchy.


Developing an understanding of how the other party operates is critical for developing a more integrated approach. Years ago, when implementing their DfM program, HP used to establish combined teams (product development & manufacturing) that took the product from concept to market. That team then lead the manufacturing for the first 6 months of production, gaining an understanding of the implications of decisions taken in the design process. This helped us in those days foster the link between the two processes.


But the human aspect is not the only one. The product lifecycle process is mainly articulated around a PLM system, while the cash-to-cash process runs on an ERP system. Both systems are different in nature and integrating them is difficult. Often the introduction of the new product is the breakpoint. That is where the BOM and associated information is transferred from the PLM system to the ERP one. But that does not resolve the post NPI engineering changes, so building a bridge between PLM and ERP is a real need. SAP has done that with their SAP PLM module, but this one is not popular in the discrete manufacturing world. So, the problem remains.


One additional level of complexity is the increased involvement of suppliers in both the product lifecycle and cash-to-cash processes. Being it due to manufacturing outsourcing, or to optimize the utilization of specific components or technologies, one is now confronted not only with the integration of PLM and ERP, but also with the linkage of the supplier (and his systems) in the information flow. We believe that, moving forward, the latter will be addressed through community clouds, as described elsewhere on this blog.


There is space for a true PLM/ERP integration ant to my knowledge, this has not been solved yet in a satisfactory way. There is still room for improvement.

We encourage you to share your comments on this post. Comments are moderated and will be reviewed and posted as promptly as possible during regular business hours.

To ensure your comment is published, please follow our community guidelines.

Comments
by Anonymous(anon) on 04-16-2010 11:01 PM

Yes is true. PLM to ERP remain an area of overlapping, often with conflict and more often with redundancies.


Interestingly there have been different approaches with some success and with focus on selected section - e.g. part information transfer -  of the integration/exchange.


Keys - seems to me - is the involvement of diverse actors and  the definition and the exploration of a scope beyond the contingent issues.


Overall this topic remain a difficult and an unsolved problem, perhaps one of the greatest opportunity.


- Dario.

by Anonymous(anon) on 04-23-2010 10:51 AM

I think integration of PLM and ERP is a very important topic that not resolved already many years. In my view this topic requires demystification and understanding of real roots and options to integration. Some of my thoughts on this are here --- PLM vs. ERP: weird or different.  plmtwine.com/.../plm-vs-erp-weird-or-different


Also the following one --- The Innovation on PLM/ERP Edge (plmtwine.com/.../innovation-on-the-plm-erp-edge).


Best, Oleg

Post a Comment
Be sure to enter a unique name. You can't reuse a name that's already in use.
Be sure to enter a unique email address. You can't reuse an email address that's already in use.
Type the characters you see in the picture above.Type the words you hear.

Find HP in Social Media

Facebook Twitter YouTube SlideShare Flickr
About the Author
  • Christian is responsible defining HP's Cloud Reference Architecture and coordination of cloud activities across HP. Links with CTO community and meets customers and partners on business & IT alignment and integration.
  • Guillaume Oget, Global Industry Strategist for HP Technology Consulting, is responsible for creating a Vertical Industry Strategy covering internal organizational models, industry solutions portfolio, and go to market strategy to enable Technology Consulting to better address Industry specific needs. Guillaume is also leading solution development in the Banking, Healthcare and Retail industry segments. Prior to joining Technology Consulting, Guillaume served as an Industry Architect for the Transportation Industry globally where he initiated cloud solutions and supported consultative selling initiatives. Before that, Guillaume setup and managed a global RFID solutions practice for 5 years, supporting more than 50 projects in industries covering Retail, Banking and Transportation. He had direct assignments with Telecom, Banking and Retail clients in all regions. Guillaume has filed 9 patents, including 5 granted in the RFID space and has a CISSP certification.