Teaching, Learning & Technology
Sharing best practices from faculty around the world who are using technology to transform teaching and learning.

Independent studies question if "platform agnostic" exists

What was the one-word stumbling block most encountered by educators in their digital learning efforts during the 2013-2014 school year? The issue likely to repeat itself into 2015 and beyond? One where a false sense of security leads many school systems down the same troublesome path?Infographic.jpg

 

Compatibility!

 

Back to my days as a K-12 administrator, I’ve heard the term “platform agnostic” used by software and content publishers to comfort school leaders to sign the purchase order. Over the years, we’ve heard the same thing from hardware manufacturers as greater variety in operating systems meant there were more choices, but also more possible problems for schools.

 

No matter how effective an instructional resource may be, when a student’s device is unable to correctly display and work with that content, teaching and learning are compromised. And while many companies have used the term “device [or] platform agnostic” the truth is not all stand up to that test.

 

The Backstory

 

Last summer, a major urban school system began planning for a large 1:1 deployment. One of their requirements was with a particular social studies curriculum. Although dozens of hardware vendors introduced an array of choices, every one of them claimed to be compatible. Yet when we tested the online LMS in different platforms, we kept experiencing multiple errors. Chapter openers, lesson videos, organizational tools….even games….didn’t work on several platforms that were simultaneously being told were “compatible” with the district’s choices. Clearly the definition of “compatible” differed between buyer and seller. Schools expect 100% compatibility to provide the greatest access to learning.

 

Having won that 1:1 learning deployment with Intel and Microsoft, our three companies discussed this issue and felt that clear, objective data on this subject was clearly lacking in our industry. As a result, we engaged an independent research firm – Principled Technologies – to examine this compatibility question.

 

Over the past few months, their team developed learning progressions – specific examples of how technology may be used at different grade levels over a course of the school day. It would include resources from academic publishers, online resources and specific applications. Different tests would examine Windows 8.1 as well as iOS, Android http://facts.pt/1yNFu7g and Chrome OS options http://facts.pt/1iFBpNr.

 

The Results

 

Their studies finally confirmed what many of us had known. Windows 8.1 provided the most compatible access to the content and tools, more so than the other operating systems. Compatibility issues around Flash and HTML 5 created problems on iOS and Android devices, many of which could not be solved with work-arounds like Flash-based browsers (including Puffin). Some of the sites even warned users in advance when logging in on select devices that they may encounter compatibility issues.

 

Chrome OS devices also ran into compatibility issues, particularly around Java. The most surprising facet of the report was that the Chromebook tested was unable to properly view a location in 3D in Google Maps.

 

All of the devices tested and the corresponding operating systems can be effectively used in education. I personally hope this study isn’t interpreted to suggest otherwise. But as a selection resource, schools should be aware of compatibility issues, and make sure it is part of their process. We want educators to enter any agreement with their eyes fully open, knowing what they can and cannot do with their devices.

 

Over the past year, consortiums PARCC and Smarter Balanced have gone to great lengths to offer the most open-standards-based online testing. They are working with testing firms to ensure compatible access across a wide range of devices and operating systems. But this may be creating a false sense of security to educators. “If my digital testing is compatible with the device, it must be good enough, right?”

 

Wrong!

Comments
Prashanth(anon) | ‎08-07-2014 01:00 PM

Thanks for the FANTASTIC post! This information is really good and thanks a ton for sharing it :-) I m looking forward desperately for the next post of yours.

Bulk SMS Hyderabad.

Leave a Comment

We encourage you to share your comments on this post. Comments are moderated and will be reviewed
and posted as promptly as possible during regular business hours

To ensure your comment is published, be sure to follow the community guidelines.

Be sure to enter a unique name. You can't reuse a name that's already in use.
Be sure to enter a unique email address. You can't reuse an email address that's already in use.
Type the characters you see in the picture above.Type the words you hear.
Search
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Do you mean 
About the Author
A former K-12 district administrator and adjunct professor of communication, Elliott has won over 60 state and national awards in school pub...
Featured


Follow Us
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of HP. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.