How should an organization measure progress in cloud adoption?

by on 12-10-2009 10:01 PM

I was recently asked how an organization adopting cloud should measure progress and thought back to the days when I was working with balanced scorecarding. There is a need for both leading and lagging indicators of performance.  Here were my initial thoughts; I'd love to hear other perspectives.



  • Provisioning time (down, leading)

  • Service reuse  (up, lagging)

  • Utilization (hardware, storage...)  (up, lagging)

  • Uptime/hour  (down, lagging)

  • In house personnel dedicated to operations support (down, lagging)

  • Business value generated per effort hour (up, lagging)

  • Business value generated per watt consumed (up, lagging)

  • % of IT budget dedicated to fixed costs and maintenance  (down, lagging)


Clearly, I need some more leading indicators. I haven't even started to think about aligning them to the 4 perspectives of metrics for a balanced scorecard.

We encourage you to share your comments on this post. Comments are moderated and will be reviewed and posted as promptly as possible during regular business hours.

To ensure your comment is published, please follow our community guidelines.

Comments
by on 12-11-2009 07:36 AM

I should have mentioned that the items in parenthesis are  first "the good trend" and if it was a leading or lagging indicator.  

Post a Comment
Be sure to enter a unique name. You can't reuse a name that's already in use.
Be sure to enter a unique email address. You can't reuse an email address that's already in use.
Type the characters you see in the picture above.Type the words you hear.

Find HP in Social Media

Facebook Twitter YouTube SlideShare Flickr
About the Author
Labels