The Next Big Thing
Posts about next generation technologies and their effect on business.

Operational Automation will Always Win Out in the End

automation.pngWhen I think about the current discussion about moving work off-shore I think of it as a cost saving tactic that will happen, but will eventually be overcome by events.

 

Having an on-site workforce is expensive and will continue to go up over time (inflation). You can find low cost locations. They start out low, but inflationary pressures (supply and demand) will force them up too. Once they pass the price point of another location, those resources will join into the mix as well. The management of this workforce will become more and more complex until a point is reached where the value generated is not worth the communications issues or other complexities and the environment stabilizes.

 

Automation on the other hand starts out as being very expensive to implement, but its costs continue to lower over time. It should result in higher quality as well. There are inflationary pressures for automation, but they’re offset in larger organizations by being able to leverage the techniques across a wider base for a relatively minor additional investment.

 

One perspective of this is that when I am saying “I am only human”, I’m really talking about how creative humans are. As an organization implements a more standardized and stable environment (automated), the need for creativity changes to focus on optimization and problem solving for unusual events. We’ll always need people to come up with new ideas and solutions, but it will be a different kind of role than what most individuals in an organization perform today.

 

I was talking with Randy Mears about this and he agreed that automation eventually will win out in areas that can be effectively automated, but many times the initial attempts are done poorly or for the wrong reasons. A great example of this is interactive voice response (e.g., press 1 for technical support). These can be some of the most frustrating man-machine interfaces we encounter on a regular basis. The drive for a lower costs solution is lowering the customer service bar to the point where this kind of service is almost an expectation. They’ve effectively translated their support costs into taking up our time navigating their bureaucracy – a time honored approach. With that said, IVR can provide me with information (e.g., bank balance) that would be cost prohibitive to provide, compared to almost any other means, on a large scale in a timely fashion.

Comments
Anonymous(anon) | ‎08-04-2007 01:04 PM

Could not agree more. The challenge for many companies comes in automating the decisions that support these operations and doing so effectively. Check out www.edmblog.com/.../using-edm-to-wi.html

JT

Author of 'Smart (Enough) Systems'

Anonymous(anon) | ‎08-17-2007 07:14 AM

Absolutely!  Automation raises the focus of creativity to the next higher level of abstraction (which also tends to separate the sheep from the goats along the way).  Interestingly, standards tend to have the same effect.

We've developed tools to automate the software engineering process itself; this directly addresses the issue of IT offshoring, especially for software development.

Leave a Comment

We encourage you to share your comments on this post. Comments are moderated and will be reviewed
and posted as promptly as possible during regular business hours

To ensure your comment is published, be sure to follow the community guidelines.

Be sure to enter a unique name. You can't reuse a name that's already in use.
Be sure to enter a unique email address. You can't reuse an email address that's already in use.
Type the characters you see in the picture above.Type the words you hear.
Search
About the Author
  • Steve Simske is an HP Fellow and Director in the Printing and Content Delivery Lab in Hewlett-Packard Labs, and is the Director and Chief Technologist for the HP Labs Security Printing and Imaging program.
Follow Us