The Next Big Thing
Posts about next generation technologies and their effect on business.

Where did the IoT come from?

I was talking with some folks about the Internet of Things the other day and they showed me some analysis that made it look like it was relatively recent.

 

where did the IoT come from.jpg

 

My view is that its foundations go back a long way. I worked on (SCADA) Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition systems back in the 80s, which were gathering data off the factory floor, analyzing it and performing predictive analytics, even way back then.


In the 70s, passive RFID came into being and one of the first places it was used was tracking cows for the department of agriculture to ensure they were given the right dosage of medicine and hormones – since cows could talk for themselves.

 

In the late 70s and early 80s barcodes become widely used to identify objects, allowing greater tracking of manufacturing lines as well as consumers in stores.

 

In the 90s, higher speed and greater range allowed for toll tags to be placed on cars, allowing for greater ease of identification but still very little use of sensors to collect additional information.

 

At the turn of the century, the military and Walmart required the use of RFID to track products and that caused significant increase in their adoption. About the same time, low powered sensing capabilities were developed since RFID only provided identification and the scanner provided location, people began to look at other information that could be collected like temperature, humidity as well as ways to gather information remotely like smart metering in the utilities space (although even that started much earlier).

 

Most technology adoption follows an S curve for investment and value generation. We’re just now entering the steep part of the S curve where the real business models and excitement is generated. It is not really all that new it is just that the capabilities have caught up with demand and that is making us think about everything differently (and proactively).

How much does our view of the future define our creativity?

Cloud optimist.pngA few weeks ago I did a blog post on the technology in the world in 2045. I got a range of email from those who view the world in a positive light and those who are negative about the world of the future (and the human race in general). I found this very negative view for a technologist a bit odd, but that is probably just me.

 

One approach I have started to take when looking at technology adoption and the needs of others is to try and address both supply and demand. There is so much abundance around us that can create even greater abundance by enabling the use of what is in short supply effectively. It takes innovators to understand the conflict and capitalize upon it. There are those that can only see the shortages and feel like victims. My perspective is more positive about our options and see it as an opportunity for us to persevere using our native creativity.

 

It will not be the same as today. The technologies that we deal with every day have a significant role in making everything around us better. There are many possibilities, but it is up to us to look for those answers if we want the future we desire.

 

The best way to predict the future is to invent it. -- Alan Kay

The converging Venn diagram of industry future trends

industry venn.jpgBack in math class, I remember we used to use Venn diagrams to show similarities and differences between sets of objects. I was in a meeting today where we were talking about business and technology trends and the impact on technology adoption… and those models started dancing through my head.

 

We had a great deal of examples of what was happening to shift value in finance, government, manufacturing and most other topics. We started to talk about agriculture and relatively few examples presented themselves. Right before we moved on to the next industry, I said something like: “There really isn’t that much difference between the shifts taking place in agriculture and process manufacturing.”

 

This got into a whole philosophical discussion about how agriculture deals with living things so it can’t be automated or be influenced to the extent of manufacturing. I tried not to bring up wine and beer production, but couldn’t help myself.

 

So just to get people out of their comfort zone I said, “Well if that’s the case, then agriculture is really more like Health care.” Which started a whole other vector of discussion.

 

In the end, we all reached a perspective that in many ways the abundance of technology and the pressures of business are actually allowing many of these industry differences to dissolve. It may also allow a new dimension of differences to come to the surface that were hidden before.

 

The possibilities of this polymorphic view, pulling advances in one area and applying them to others is an important part of any innovation exercise. We might need to shake up our preconceptions though about where innovations can be reapplied.

Periodic assessment time

predictive.pngEvery once in a while it is time to take a step back and look at your life, what you are doing, the impact it has and even your own value system. I had one of those moments thrust upon my family when HP offered me an early retirement option.

 

For me, I asked questions like:

  1. How sure are you that you will be happy in the coming years?
  2. How can you be sure that your relationships with your spouse and family will become an enduring source of happiness?
  3. Are you having the influence on the company and industry that you should?

 

For technologists it can also offer an opportunity to think about how you are marketing your efforts to others. Fortunately for me, this was a career choice -- where decisions can be made.

 

Technologists should periodically take the opportunity for these kinds of personal assessments. I had a leader I worked for once who did this assessment  every Thanksgiving (for those outside the US, but this is a holiday focused on looking at the bounty available to us and actively being thankful for it). For whatever the reason, we should not passively accept the status quo, but actively ensure that we’re creating the future we desire.

 

I mentioned last week the changing role of the CIO. These factors are also a driver for all technologists to assess their future and can enter into the evaluation process.

Search
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Do you mean 
Follow Us
Featured
About the Author(s)
  • Steve Simske is an HP Fellow and Director in the Printing and Content Delivery Lab in Hewlett-Packard Labs, and is the Director and Chief Technologist for the HP Labs Security Printing and Imaging program.
Labels
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of HP. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.